HOPIQ FACEOFF
76%
Overall similarity
hopIQ take
London Lager if you want restraint and drinkability,
WRCLW Lager if you want presence and substance.
Both sit at 22 IBUs, so bitterness isn't the differentiator—it's the half-percent of alcohol and what Meantime does with it versus what Browar Stu Mostów does. The London is engineered for session drinking; the WRCLW is engineered to actually taste like something.
At a glance
Generated from the four anchored axes — never hand-written.
Structurally near-identical
Structurally these two are the same beer. The difference is in the aromatics. Bitterness and texture match within Δ 1. WRCLW Lager runs a touch fuller in body (Δ 2). London Lager brings a distinct smooth note that WRCLW Lager doesn't.
Beer DNA
Body
Δ 2
Sweetness
Δ 2
Situations
In words
London Lager
Meantime's London Lager tastes like someone asked a brewer to make a lager that gets out of its own way. It's clean, almost austere—crisp without being sharp, with just enough grain sweetness to remind you it's beer and not sparkling water. The 4.5% ABV feels intentional; this is a beer that knows its lane and stays in it. You'll drink three of these without noticing.
WRCLW Lager
WRCLW hits differently. There's actual malt character here—a subtle toasted grain backbone that suggests someone spent time on the grist bill. At 5%, it's got just enough weight to feel complete, not light. It's still clean and lager-crisp, but it's got a quiet confidence that the London doesn't quite reach. This is a beer with opinions, even if it's whispering them.
See what fits your taste
hopIQ scores every beer against your palate, not the average drinker's.
Build your Beer DNAKeep exploring
Beers like London Lager
View alternatives →Beers like WRCLW Lager
View alternatives →Bitterness
Δ 0
Texture
Δ 1
Only London Lager
Shared character
Only WRCLW Lager